Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://localhost/handle/Hannan/4751
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorMajid Behzadian-
dc.contributorS. Khanmohammadi-
dc.contributorMorteza Yazdani-
dc.contributorJoshua Ignatius-
dc.date.accessioned2023-05-05T06:59:21Z-
dc.date.available2023-05-05T06:59:21Z-
dc.date.issued2012en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://localhost/handle/Hannan/4751-
dc.description.abstractMulti-Criteria Decision Aid (MCDA) or Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) methods have received much attention from researchers and practitioners in evaluating, assessing and ranking alternatives across diverse industries. Among numerous MCDA/MCDM methods developed to solve real-world decision problems, the Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) continues to work satisfactorily across different application areas. In this paper, we conduct a state-of-the-art literature survey to taxonomize the research on TOPSIS applications and methodologies. The classification scheme for this review contains 266 scholarly papers from 103 journals since the year 2000, separated into nine application areas: (1) Supply Chain Management and Logistics, (2) Design, Engineering and Manufacturing Systems, (3) Business and Marketing Management, (4) Health, Safety and Environment Management, (5) Human Resources Management, (6) Energy Management, (7) Chemical Engineering, (8) Water Resources Management and (9) Other topics. Scholarly papers in the TOPSIS discipline are further interpreted based on (1) publication year, (2) publication journal, (3) authors’ nationality and (4) other methods combined or compared with TOPSIS. We end our review paper with recommendations for future research in TOPSIS decision-making that is both forward-looking and practically oriented. This paper provides useful insights into the TOPSIS method and suggests a framework for future attempts in this area for academic researchers and practitioners.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.subjectTOPSIS/ MCDA /MCDM/ Literature review/ Application areasen_US
dc.titleA state-of the-art survey of TOPSIS applications-
dc.typeArticleen_US
Appears in Collections:تمامی گرایش های مدیریت شامل مدیریت بازرگانی و صنعتی

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
199.pdf547.62 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
Preview File
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorMajid Behzadian-
dc.contributorS. Khanmohammadi-
dc.contributorMorteza Yazdani-
dc.contributorJoshua Ignatius-
dc.date.accessioned2023-05-05T06:59:21Z-
dc.date.available2023-05-05T06:59:21Z-
dc.date.issued2012en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://localhost/handle/Hannan/4751-
dc.description.abstractMulti-Criteria Decision Aid (MCDA) or Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) methods have received much attention from researchers and practitioners in evaluating, assessing and ranking alternatives across diverse industries. Among numerous MCDA/MCDM methods developed to solve real-world decision problems, the Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) continues to work satisfactorily across different application areas. In this paper, we conduct a state-of-the-art literature survey to taxonomize the research on TOPSIS applications and methodologies. The classification scheme for this review contains 266 scholarly papers from 103 journals since the year 2000, separated into nine application areas: (1) Supply Chain Management and Logistics, (2) Design, Engineering and Manufacturing Systems, (3) Business and Marketing Management, (4) Health, Safety and Environment Management, (5) Human Resources Management, (6) Energy Management, (7) Chemical Engineering, (8) Water Resources Management and (9) Other topics. Scholarly papers in the TOPSIS discipline are further interpreted based on (1) publication year, (2) publication journal, (3) authors’ nationality and (4) other methods combined or compared with TOPSIS. We end our review paper with recommendations for future research in TOPSIS decision-making that is both forward-looking and practically oriented. This paper provides useful insights into the TOPSIS method and suggests a framework for future attempts in this area for academic researchers and practitioners.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.subjectTOPSIS/ MCDA /MCDM/ Literature review/ Application areasen_US
dc.titleA state-of the-art survey of TOPSIS applications-
dc.typeArticleen_US
Appears in Collections:تمامی گرایش های مدیریت شامل مدیریت بازرگانی و صنعتی

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
199.pdf547.62 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
Preview File
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorMajid Behzadian-
dc.contributorS. Khanmohammadi-
dc.contributorMorteza Yazdani-
dc.contributorJoshua Ignatius-
dc.date.accessioned2023-05-05T06:59:21Z-
dc.date.available2023-05-05T06:59:21Z-
dc.date.issued2012en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://localhost/handle/Hannan/4751-
dc.description.abstractMulti-Criteria Decision Aid (MCDA) or Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) methods have received much attention from researchers and practitioners in evaluating, assessing and ranking alternatives across diverse industries. Among numerous MCDA/MCDM methods developed to solve real-world decision problems, the Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) continues to work satisfactorily across different application areas. In this paper, we conduct a state-of-the-art literature survey to taxonomize the research on TOPSIS applications and methodologies. The classification scheme for this review contains 266 scholarly papers from 103 journals since the year 2000, separated into nine application areas: (1) Supply Chain Management and Logistics, (2) Design, Engineering and Manufacturing Systems, (3) Business and Marketing Management, (4) Health, Safety and Environment Management, (5) Human Resources Management, (6) Energy Management, (7) Chemical Engineering, (8) Water Resources Management and (9) Other topics. Scholarly papers in the TOPSIS discipline are further interpreted based on (1) publication year, (2) publication journal, (3) authors’ nationality and (4) other methods combined or compared with TOPSIS. We end our review paper with recommendations for future research in TOPSIS decision-making that is both forward-looking and practically oriented. This paper provides useful insights into the TOPSIS method and suggests a framework for future attempts in this area for academic researchers and practitioners.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.subjectTOPSIS/ MCDA /MCDM/ Literature review/ Application areasen_US
dc.titleA state-of the-art survey of TOPSIS applications-
dc.typeArticleen_US
Appears in Collections:تمامی گرایش های مدیریت شامل مدیریت بازرگانی و صنعتی

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
199.pdf547.62 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
Preview File